I feel obligated to make at least one AO post considering saying absolutely nothing would be such a turnaround from my onslaught of posts last year. Not that I haven't been closely following the action (it is my favourite Grand Slam of the year, due in large part to it being the only tennis tournament I have the luxury of intimately following for its entire duration). I have to say that something felt lacking in this year's tournament ... considering the AO has regularly hosted some memorable epics & a few of the most thrilling matches I've ever seen (e.g. Roddick v El Aynaoui QF 2003; Marat v Roddick AND THEN Marat v Agassi in the QF & SF respectively in 2004; Marat v Roger SF 2005—nothing else will ever compare, Nole v Fed SF 2008; Rafa v Verdasco SF & Rafa v Fed Final 2009). I didn't feel very engaged with this year's draw. Nole had a gift of a draw, not really being tested until the QF, which he lost in abysmal style 2-1 sets up. Rafa didn't look his best though he fought hard against Murray until he retired. Dinara retired. Baghdatis retired in much-hyped match against Hewitt, though he was playing shit anyway. Marat retired, only forever. Čilić v Delpo apparently a good match but never saw a second of it. Shining light was Čilić defeating Roddick, but even then it didn't mean much (and not that I watched it). Fed v Tsonga terminally underwhelming and utterly disappointing for a Grand Slam semifinal. Murray no hope against Fed, Fed wins 16th major, GOAT status reinforced, etc.
Well. Not all is lost. I did finally realise my latent love for one certain umpire who I've always appreciated and been drawn to but whose name I ever knew. Until Whit told me "Unrick Malina or some shit is the umpire ... Enrich? No Clue" during the Roddick v Gonzo match (which was yet another disappointment and a subset of the crowd woefully misbehaved, but anyway). I googled, found a spelling correction (Enric Molina) and a link to an article interviewing him with his picture, which confirmed it indeed was him. That was the QF, I'm not sure whether he chaired a match after that, but I was elated to discover he was selected to be the umpire for the men's final. The height of interest always occurs when I start taking pictures of the TV. This isn't even like following a player, when you can see their schedule and they have their own website and each televised match is at least 50% focused on them (or 75% if they're the higher ranked player, 95% if they happen to be Roger Federer). The only time you get to see an umpire is at the start of the match (flipping the coin – which I woefully missed because a) I didn't know he'd umpire the final and b) I was being driven back from dinner/grocery shopping & missed all the opening hoo-hah), or when a player challenges a call/argues with the umpire. I don't even know the next time I'll even see his face, so ... for the record.

"Ladies & gentlemen, Murray is challenging the call on the right baseline."

"The ball was called out."
( ~what does Hawk-Eye say~ )
I really adore his demeanour when he's umpiring, he seems very attentive (always quick to call the score), calm, composed, utterly professional, sympathetic to the players and fair. I don't get any imposing, cavalier, arrogant, stiff, nervous or sloppy vibe from him. I love his voice, the slight accent, the musical, balanced tone. (Shit – I just realised that I missed all that part where the players shake his hand after the match ... probably too absorbed in the moment of Fed victory & Murray's loss.) Anyywaaayyy. Basically from the way he carries out his professional duties I just think he'd be a lovely man with a wonderful temperament, and I'm a sucker for goodness in others.
Just like I instantly feel sympathetic towards players who cry at trophy presentations (except Fed last year ... that was a little too much). I did feel for Murray when he was so emotional he just gave up mid-way through his speech because he didn't want to start breaking down in front of the microphone. Of course it didn't help that Roger was so elated (by his own admission) and chatty in his own speech. (Quite a contrast to Rafa, who was clearly concerned and moved by Roger's tears last year, such that Rafa couldn't even properly savour his victory.) Still, you can't argue that Roger just played better than Murray. At the end of the day, one's tennis speaks for itself.
Apart from Enric, another plus that can be taken from this year's AO is that Nole reaches a career-high ranking of #2 (at least according to a sloppy edit on his Wiki page from a fan who doesn't know how to spell February). Granted, Nole could've (and should've) reached that ranking last year had he beaten Jarkko Nieminen at Sydney, but at least it's happened. I said when the AO wrapped last year I had grave doubts whether Nole could keep his #3 ranking. He's elected to play less tournaments this year and still has a significant number of points to defend, so we'll see what happens throughout the year. In most respects 2009 was a decent year for him, particularly near the tail end when he won back-to-back tournaments in Basel & Paris. Hopefully the reduced schedule works to his advantage. Apparently Todd Martin is trying to get him to be a more offensive player & come to the net more, though hopefully not at the expense of his serve, which just about died in hell during the Tsonga match. And may Sergio Tacchini design him something better. Something more closely resembling what he used to wear with Adidas perhaps? You know I loved those shirts.
Well. Not all is lost. I did finally realise my latent love for one certain umpire who I've always appreciated and been drawn to but whose name I ever knew. Until Whit told me "Unrick Malina or some shit is the umpire ... Enrich? No Clue" during the Roddick v Gonzo match (which was yet another disappointment and a subset of the crowd woefully misbehaved, but anyway). I googled, found a spelling correction (Enric Molina) and a link to an article interviewing him with his picture, which confirmed it indeed was him. That was the QF, I'm not sure whether he chaired a match after that, but I was elated to discover he was selected to be the umpire for the men's final. The height of interest always occurs when I start taking pictures of the TV. This isn't even like following a player, when you can see their schedule and they have their own website and each televised match is at least 50% focused on them (or 75% if they're the higher ranked player, 95% if they happen to be Roger Federer). The only time you get to see an umpire is at the start of the match (flipping the coin – which I woefully missed because a) I didn't know he'd umpire the final and b) I was being driven back from dinner/grocery shopping & missed all the opening hoo-hah), or when a player challenges a call/argues with the umpire. I don't even know the next time I'll even see his face, so ... for the record.

"Ladies & gentlemen, Murray is challenging the call on the right baseline."

"The ball was called out."
( ~what does Hawk-Eye say~ )
I really adore his demeanour when he's umpiring, he seems very attentive (always quick to call the score), calm, composed, utterly professional, sympathetic to the players and fair. I don't get any imposing, cavalier, arrogant, stiff, nervous or sloppy vibe from him. I love his voice, the slight accent, the musical, balanced tone. (Shit – I just realised that I missed all that part where the players shake his hand after the match ... probably too absorbed in the moment of Fed victory & Murray's loss.) Anyywaaayyy. Basically from the way he carries out his professional duties I just think he'd be a lovely man with a wonderful temperament, and I'm a sucker for goodness in others.
Just like I instantly feel sympathetic towards players who cry at trophy presentations (except Fed last year ... that was a little too much). I did feel for Murray when he was so emotional he just gave up mid-way through his speech because he didn't want to start breaking down in front of the microphone. Of course it didn't help that Roger was so elated (by his own admission) and chatty in his own speech. (Quite a contrast to Rafa, who was clearly concerned and moved by Roger's tears last year, such that Rafa couldn't even properly savour his victory.) Still, you can't argue that Roger just played better than Murray. At the end of the day, one's tennis speaks for itself.
Apart from Enric, another plus that can be taken from this year's AO is that Nole reaches a career-high ranking of #2 (at least according to a sloppy edit on his Wiki page from a fan who doesn't know how to spell February). Granted, Nole could've (and should've) reached that ranking last year had he beaten Jarkko Nieminen at Sydney, but at least it's happened. I said when the AO wrapped last year I had grave doubts whether Nole could keep his #3 ranking. He's elected to play less tournaments this year and still has a significant number of points to defend, so we'll see what happens throughout the year. In most respects 2009 was a decent year for him, particularly near the tail end when he won back-to-back tournaments in Basel & Paris. Hopefully the reduced schedule works to his advantage. Apparently Todd Martin is trying to get him to be a more offensive player & come to the net more, though hopefully not at the expense of his serve, which just about died in hell during the Tsonga match. And may Sergio Tacchini design him something better. Something more closely resembling what he used to wear with Adidas perhaps? You know I loved those shirts.
1 | +




